IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Heidepriem Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 32 3 10 13 0.406 0.1362 0.1385 0.3747 0.3810
2019-20 — NAHL 53 7 19 26 0.491 0.1743 0.1743 0.5175 0.5175
2020-21 Chippewa Steel NAHL 10 1 1 2 0.200 0.0711 0.0711 0.2110 0.2110
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 21 7 2 9 0.429
2023-24 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 24 2 5 7 0.292
2022-23 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 10 1 4 5 0.500
2021-22 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 22 1 8 9 0.409
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2021-22 · Skidmore
+244.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40963
Forward overall
#2235
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Leimbrock
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Mecrones
New England · 2014-15
0.483 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Sabre
Williams · 2019-20
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.