IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Lycan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Navan Grads CCHL 62 13 23 36 0.581 0.1259 0.1238 0.4492 0.4418
2019-20 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 49 6 13 19 0.388 0.1425 0.1425 0.4093 0.4093
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 23 6 6 12 0.522
2022-23 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 20 3 3 6 0.300
2021-22 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 18 1 2 3 0.167
2020-21 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33706
Forward overall
#1824
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Greco
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Lavery
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2023-24
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Prescott
Nichols · 2010-11
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.