IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Nasca Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 49 4 6 10 0.204 0.1138 0.1217 0.1650 0.1765
2019-20 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 49 8 9 17 0.347 0.1374 0.1374 0.3642 0.3642
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 49 4 18 22 0.449 0.1779 0.1779 0.4714 0.4714
2021-22 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 53 6 14 20 0.377 0.1495 0.1387 0.3962 0.3675
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SR 25 1 0 1 0.040
2024-25 Mercyhurst D1 AHA JR 31 1 3 4 0.129
2023-24 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SO 24 0 1 1 0.042
2022-23 Mercyhurst D1 AHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10062
Defenseman overall
#1935
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Kangas
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Johnston
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ignat Belov
Hobart · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.