← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ignat Belov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-10 Country: Belarus
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Westminster NE-Prep 26 11 12 23 0.885 0.1783 0.1783 0.4049 0.4049
2019-20 USHL 13 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Maine Nordiques NAHL 32 4 4 8 0.250 0.0928 0.0928 0.2647 0.2647
2021-22 Maine Nordiques NAHL 59 21 23 44 0.746 0.2769 0.2569 0.7897 0.7326
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 28 5 8 13 0.464
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 29 3 9 12 0.414
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 30 16 21 37 1.233
2022-23 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 28 11 3 14 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2022-23 · Hobart
+159.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26701
Forward overall
#1038
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2008-09
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.