IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rudi Pino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 — NAHL 27 3 4 7 0.259 0.0953 0.0964 0.2737 0.2768
2009-10 Texas Tornado NAHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0919 0.0893 0.2639 0.2563
2010-11 — NAHL 56 21 23 44 0.786 0.2887 0.2657 0.8293 0.7632
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 15 5 4 9 0.600
2012-13 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 27 11 14 25 0.926
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2012-13 · Lawrence
+454.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24146
Forward overall
#905
Forward born in 1990
#1869
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Lemirande
Lawrence · 2011-12
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Glynn Robitaille
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Kesselring
Curry · 2024-25
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.