IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Johnston Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — NCDC 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Chicago Cougars USPHL-Premier 43 51 39 90 2.093 0.2817 0.2817 0.7125 0.7125
2021-22 New England Wolves EHL 46 18 19 37 0.804 0.1726 0.1636 0.3939 0.3733
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Dartmouth D3 — SR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2024-25 UMass Dartmouth D3 — JR 17 3 6 9 0.529
2023-24 UMass Dartmouth D3 — SO 15 7 3 10 0.667
2022-23 UMass Dartmouth D3 — FR 26 5 7 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2022-23 · UMass Dartmouth
+229.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18070
Forward overall
#629
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ignat Belov
Hobart · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Deady
Becker · 2016-17
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Modahl
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2001-02
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.