IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Kring Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 50 7 9 16 0.320 0.1176 0.1176 0.3378 0.3378
2020-21 Janesville Jets NAHL 38 1 11 12 0.316 0.1160 0.1160 0.3333 0.3333
2021-22 Janesville Jets NAHL 60 6 10 16 0.267 0.0980 0.0925 0.2815 0.2658
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 26 6 9 15 0.577
2024-25 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 25 6 13 19 0.760
2023-24 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 27 2 6 8 0.296
2022-23 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 25 6 9 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2022-23 · Bethel
+587.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14419
Defenseman overall
#2451
Defenseman born in 2001
#4694
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Landon Brownlee
Middlebury · 2024-25
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Baxter Kimball
Fredonia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Boucher
Albertus Magnus · 2024-25
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.