← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Spinner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 NAHL 50 4 12 16 0.320 0.1137 0.1137 0.3360 0.3360
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 33 0 7 7 0.212 0.0753 0.0753 0.2227 0.2227
2021-22 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 39 1 8 9 0.231 0.0820 0.0768 0.2423 0.2271
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 20 3 4 7 0.350
2024-25 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 16 0 4 4 0.250
2023-24 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 18 1 5 6 0.333
2022-23 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 14 2 1 3 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2022-23 · Saint John's
+195.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17458
Defenseman overall
#2791
Defenseman born in 2001
#5347
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2024-25
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Mary's · 2000-01
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.