IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Szydlowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 46 8 5 13 0.283 0.1038 0.1038 0.2983 0.2983
2020-21 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 53 9 17 26 0.491 0.1802 0.1802 0.5178 0.5178
2021-22 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 52 14 17 31 0.596 0.2297 0.2244 0.8676 0.8477
2022-23 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 34 10 16 26 0.765 0.2946 0.2734 1.1129 1.0328
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan D1 NCHC GR 39 5 6 11 0.282
2024-25 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 39 3 7 10 0.256
2023-24 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22061
Forward overall
#1195
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Keenan Hodgson
Amherst · 2013-14
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Cousineau
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Morgan
University of New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.