← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Szydlowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 46 8 5 13 0.283 0.1120 0.1120 0.2967 0.2967
2020-21 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 53 9 17 26 0.491 0.1944 0.1944 0.5151 0.5151
2021-22 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 52 14 17 31 0.596 0.2221 0.2170 0.8687 0.8487
2022-23 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 34 10 16 26 0.765 0.2849 0.2644 1.1142 1.0340
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan D1 NCHC GR 39 5 6 11 0.282
2024-25 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 39 3 7 10 0.256
2023-24 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21889
Forward overall
#1195
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.