← New Search ↗ Social Card

Billy Simms Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 NAHL 39 2 9 11 0.282 0.1036 0.1036 0.2978 0.2978
2020-21 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 21 0 4 4 0.191 0.0700 0.0659 0.2011 0.1894
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Cleary University ACHA_D1 26 2 5 7 0.269
2024-25 Cleary University ACHA_D1 26 2 5 7 0.269
2023-24 Cleary University ACHA_D1 26 2 5 7 0.269
2022-23 Cleary University ACHA_D1 26 2 5 7 0.269
2021-22 Cleary University ACHA_D1 26 2 5 7 0.269
2020-21 Cleary University ACHA_D1 26 2 5 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2020-21 · Cleary University
+175.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18458
Defenseman overall
#2888
Defenseman born in 2001
#5562
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2024-25
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2013-14
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.