IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Henry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0561 0.0534 0.1645 0.1565
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Suffolk D1 CNE SR 25 2 5 7 0.280
2018-19 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 25 2 5 7 0.280
2017-18 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 22 2 8 10 0.455
2016-17 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 21 4 4 8 0.381
2015-16 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 10 1 1 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2015-16 · Suffolk
+337.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33758
Forward overall
#1311
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Burke
Finlandia · 2009-10
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jasper Korican-Barlay
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Riddell
New England College · 2005-06
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.