← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryden Sinclair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-07-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 60 5 21 26 0.433 0.0834 0.0904 0.2732 0.2961
2019-20 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 50 1 7 8 0.160 0.0588 0.0588 0.1689 0.1689
2020-21 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 17 0 2 2 0.118 0.0453 0.0453 0.1711 0.1711
2021-22 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 54 4 20 24 0.444 0.0855 0.0800 0.2802 0.2621
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC 22 2 4 6 0.273
2022-23 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC 25 2 6 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2022-23 · Anna Maria
+303.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19828
Defenseman overall
#3006
Defenseman born in 2001
#1521
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2011-12
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2021-22
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.