← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Sloth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-07-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 45 0 6 6 0.133 0.0473 0.0473 0.1400 0.1400
2020-21 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 24 1 5 6 0.250 0.0277 0.0277
2021-22 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 40 5 39 44 1.100 0.1217 0.1139 0.3485 0.3262
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 5 0 2 2 0.400
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 10 1 1 2 0.200
2022-23 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 23 2 2 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Gustavus Adolphus
+61.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11109
Defenseman overall
#2054
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2004-05
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2018-19
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2022-23
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.