IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Cimino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 47 2 2 4 0.085 0.0313 0.0313 0.0898 0.0898
2020-21 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 44 5 31 36 0.818 0.3336 0.3336 0.6577 0.6577
2021-22 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 49 6 35 41 0.837 0.3411 0.3205 0.6725 0.6320
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 20 2 3 5 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2022-23 · Trinity
-17.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1828
Defenseman overall
#406
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Festa
Keene State · 2023-24
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Brenk
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Klatt
Fitchburg State · 2017-18
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.