← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Carlile Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 26 1 2 3 0.115 0.0410 0.0410 0.1212 0.1212
2020-21 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 32 4 19 23 0.719 0.0811 0.0744 0.2445 0.2244
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 16 1 2 3 0.188
2025-26 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 16 1 2 3 0.188
2024-25 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 25 2 4 6 0.240
2024-25 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 25 2 4 6 0.240
2022-23 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 21 2 4 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2022-23 · SUNY Morrisville
+307.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9821
Defenseman overall
#1903
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2017-18
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2001-02
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2006-07
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.