← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Driscoll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-08-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 58 0 7 7 0.121 0.0712 0.0760 0.3614 0.3859
2019-20 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 47 1 9 10 0.213 0.1255 0.1255 0.6371 0.6371
2020-21 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 41 0 7 7 0.171 0.1007 0.1007 0.5110 0.5110
2021-22 USHL 58 1 18 19 0.328 0.1933 0.1773 0.9808 0.8995
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 40 4 7 11 0.275
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 39 2 8 10 0.256
2023-24 Army D1 AHA 35 5 16 21 0.600
2022-23 Army D1 AHA 33 2 10 12 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2022-23 · Army
+181.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10270
Defenseman overall
#1939
Defenseman born in 2001
#3251
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2005-06
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.