IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Shell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 50 10 26 36 0.720 0.2029 0.2135 0.5829 0.6134
2019-20 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.1061 0.1061 0.3025 0.3025
2020-21 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 42 5 24 29 0.691 0.1946 0.1946 0.5590 0.5590
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 31 8 19 27 0.871
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 27 7 14 21 0.778
2022-23 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 30 4 20 24 0.800
2021-22 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 15 2 8 10 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2021-22 · Hobart
+264.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17013
Forward overall
#493
Forward born in 2000
#144
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Brady Ferguson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Haak
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Boyd
St. Norbert · 2003-04
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Keaney
Neumann · 2006-07
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Barrett
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.