IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Shell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 50 10 26 36 0.720 0.2935 0.3089 0.5787 0.6090
2019-20 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.1050 0.1050 0.3016 0.3016
2020-21 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 42 5 24 29 0.691 0.2815 0.2815 0.5550 0.5550
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 31 8 19 27 0.871
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 27 7 14 21 0.778
2022-23 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 30 4 20 24 0.800
2021-22 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 15 2 8 10 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2021-22 · Hobart
+152.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5974
Forward overall
#246
Forward born in 2000
#102
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Greenberg
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Miami (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Keaney
Neumann · 2006-07
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Doug Lindensmith
Norwich · 2008-09
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Stark
Stonehill · 2015-16
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.