IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Keaney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-07-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 40 14 11 25 0.625 0.1746 0.1860 0.4313 0.4594
2006-07 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 49 11 28 39 0.796 0.2224 0.2258 0.5493 0.5576
2007-08 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 43 10 20 30 0.698 0.1949 0.1890 0.4815 0.4670
2008-09 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 48 14 25 39 0.812 0.2270 0.2085 0.5607 0.5150
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Neumann D3 MAC SR 25 11 8 19 0.760
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC JR 17 4 5 9 0.529
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC SO 21 3 1 4 0.191
2009-10 Neumann D3 — FR 17 6 7 13 0.765
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2009-10 · Neumann
+345.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18299
Forward overall
#774
Forward born in 1988
#1291
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Reid Watson
Saint Mary's · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Stubbs
Morrisville · 2014-15
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincenzo Renda
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.