← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Boxer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Houston Bulls NAHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.1184 0.1184 0.3499 0.3499
2020-21 Houston Bulls NAHL 22 0 4 4 0.182 0.0646 0.0646 0.1909 0.1909
2021-22 NAHL 50 1 11 12 0.240 0.0852 0.0793 0.2520 0.2345
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 23 1 2 3 0.130
2024-25 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 17 0 2 2 0.118
2023-24 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 21 1 4 5 0.238
2022-23 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 14 0 2 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · St. Olaf
+90.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19371
Defenseman overall
#2965
Defenseman born in 2001
#5680
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.