IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jon Bockmann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-02-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Wellington Dukes OJHL 37 5 17 22 0.595 0.1457 0.1445 0.4089 0.4054
2007-08 Wellington Dukes OJHL 42 12 25 37 0.881 0.2159 0.2043 0.6059 0.5734
2008-09 Wellington Dukes OJHL 52 7 46 53 1.019 0.2498 0.2236 0.7009 0.6273
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 22 3 4 7 0.318
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 24 3 5 8 0.333
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 26 2 4 6 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2009-10 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+13.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4075
Defenseman overall
#709
Defenseman born in 1988
#758
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tommy Nolan
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Beaudoin
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.