IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Halvorson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 47 19 23 42 0.894 0.1077 0.1077 0.2823 0.2824
2019-20 Chippewa Steel NAHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0743 0.0743 0.2118 0.2118
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 21 6 9 15 0.714
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 12 2 9 11 0.917
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 28 13 12 25 0.893
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 3 0 1 1 0.333
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27400
Forward overall
#1165
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Conor Lemirande
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Diamond
Becker · 2017-18
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Knoepke
Wisconsin-Stout · 2007-08
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Baldino
Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.