← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen DuBois Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Francis USHS-MN 24 2 5 7 0.292 0.0369 0.0369 0.5278 0.5278
2020-21 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 13 1 4 5 0.385 0.1413 0.1413 0.4059 0.4059
2021-22 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 60 7 16 23 0.383 0.1408 0.1411 0.4046 0.4053
2022-23 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 60 12 21 33 0.550 0.2021 0.1925 0.5805 0.5531
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Air Force D1 AHA 29 2 4 6 0.207
2024-25 Air Force D1 AHA SR 34 3 3 6 0.176
2023-24 Air Force D1 AHA JR 30 4 2 6 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2023-24 · Air Force
+35.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29259
Forward overall
#1709
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2012-13
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2024-25
0.690 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2009-10
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.