IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tony Follmer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-10-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Janesville Jets NAHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3674 0.4077 1.0555 1.1714
2018-19 — USHL 56 2 4 6 0.107 0.0632 0.0649 0.3217 0.3304
2019-20 Lincoln Stars USHL 44 1 6 7 0.159 0.0939 0.0939 0.4778 0.4778
2020-21 Lincoln Stars USHL 25 0 5 5 0.200 0.1180 0.1180 0.6007 0.6007
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SR 38 2 5 7 0.184
2023-24 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 28 1 4 5 0.179
2022-23 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SO 35 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Bemidji State D1 CCHA FR 26 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16795
Defenseman overall
#2636
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Stevens
Middlebury · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Selleck
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Bandazian
Skidmore · 2005-06
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.