← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coby Weber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 NAHL 16 2 0 2 0.125 0.0459 0.0456 0.1319 0.1312
2022-23 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 44 18 10 28 0.636 0.0799 0.0745 0.2009 0.1874
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 28 14 7 21 0.750
2024-25 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 28 14 7 21 0.750
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 9 0 1 1 0.111
2023-24 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 28 14 7 21 0.750
2022-23 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 28 14 7 21 0.750
2021-22 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 28 14 7 21 0.750
2020-21 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 28 14 7 21 0.750

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45446
Forward overall
#2880
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.