IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Connett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 46 16 28 44 0.957 0.1200 0.1183 0.3020 0.2977
2019-20 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 46 39 33 72 1.565 0.1964 0.1964 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 26 3 5 8 0.308
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 23 2 1 3 0.130
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 25 1 7 8 0.320
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen FR 11 2 1 3 0.273
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 11 2 1 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2020-21 · Wisconsin-Stout
+169.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15868
Forward overall
#748
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Frank
Wentworth · 2010-11
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Clay Berger
Tufts · 2014-15
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jaret Babych
UMass Dartmouth · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.