IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonny Hammel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northeast Generals NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Boston Advantage NCDC 41 7 12 19 0.463 0.1889 0.1889 0.3725 0.3725
2021-22 Boston Advantage NCDC 45 11 15 26 0.578 0.2356 0.2358 0.4644 0.4647
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 23 11 10 21 0.913
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 22 10 10 20 0.909
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 23 5 5 10 0.435
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 17 1 5 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2022-23 · Salve Regina
+74.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
12%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13995
Forward overall
#709
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Antoine Bélisle
Middlebury · 2017-18
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Howarth
Connecticut College · 2004-05
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Sheehan
Framingham State · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.