IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonny Hammel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northeast Generals NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Boston Advantage NCDC 41 7 12 19 0.463 0.1071 0.1071 0.3747 0.3747
2021-22 Boston Advantage NCDC 45 11 15 26 0.578 0.1335 0.1336 0.4672 0.4675
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 23 11 10 21 0.913
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 22 10 10 20 0.909
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 23 5 5 10 0.435
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 17 1 5 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2022-23 · Salve Regina
+208.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
22%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16070
Forward overall
#852
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Sheehan
Framingham State · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Antoine Bélisle
Middlebury · 2017-18
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Cox
Wentworth · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.