IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Howarth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-08-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Syracuse Jr. Crunch OJHL 43 15 8 23 0.535 0.1311 0.1253 0.3661 0.3498
2005-06 Rochester Stars EJHL 42 17 10 27 0.643 0.1905 0.1777 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Connecticut College D3 — SR 12 3 3 6 0.500
2008-09 Connecticut College D3 — JR 23 10 7 17 0.739
2007-08 Connecticut College D3 — SO 25 7 8 15 0.600
2006-07 Connecticut College D3 — FR 23 13 7 20 0.870
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2006-07 · Connecticut College
+548.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31635
Forward overall
#967
Forward born in 1985

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Panchisin
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rich Dady
Fitchburg State · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jakub Hall
SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.