← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Krause Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 25 5 13 18 0.720 0.1426 0.1426 0.3280 0.3280
2019-20 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 28 8 11 19 0.679 0.1344 0.1344 0.3092 0.3092
2020-21 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 43 16 14 30 0.698 0.2563 0.2563 0.7364 0.7364
2021-22 NAHL 53 18 27 45 0.849 0.3120 0.2977 0.8962 0.8551
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SR 35 5 7 12 0.343
2024-25 Dartmouth D1 ECAC JR 31 4 8 12 0.387
2023-24 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 18 1 1 2 0.111
2022-23 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 12 3 0 3 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2022-23 · Dartmouth
+25.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17128
Forward overall
#812
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Post · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2022-23
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.