← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Herzberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 40 7 16 23 0.575 0.2042 0.2042 0.6037 0.6037
2021-22 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 50 6 11 17 0.340 0.1208 0.1204 0.3570 0.3559
2022-23 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 60 13 23 36 0.600 0.2131 0.2020 0.6299 0.5971
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC JR 26 6 8 14 0.538
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 23 5 6 11 0.478
2023-24 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 28 7 4 11 0.393
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2023-24 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+171.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27706
Forward overall
#1603
Forward born in 2002
#2332
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2004-05
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.