IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Karl Falk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-01-20 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Västerås IK U20 SuperElit 38 2 0 2 0.053 0.0208 0.0214 0.0725 0.0747
2018-19 Västerås IK U20 SuperElit 42 2 5 7 0.167 0.0658 0.0646 0.2297 0.2254
2019-20 Västerås IK U20 SuperElit 39 7 9 16 0.410 0.1619 0.1619 0.5653 0.5653
2020-21 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 35 4 18 22 0.629 0.2309 0.2309 0.6644 0.6644
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC — 28 0 4 4 0.143
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC — 33 0 2 2 0.061
2022-23 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 31 3 2 5 0.161
2021-22 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5711
Defenseman overall
#1210
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Ross
Fredonia · 2006-07
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ludvig Mellgren
Gustavus Adolphus · 2022-23
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Bizal
Buffalo State · 2018-19
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.