IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dayne Hoyord Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northern Cyclones NCDC 48 12 29 41 0.854 0.1974 0.1974 0.6883 0.6883
2020-21 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 52 7 12 19 0.365 0.1298 0.1298 0.3854 0.3854
2021-22 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 58 21 13 34 0.586 0.2083 0.2056 0.6183 0.6102
2022-23 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 57 13 29 42 0.737 0.2618 0.2455 0.7772 0.7288
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC JR 26 10 5 15 0.577
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 23 7 4 11 0.478
2023-24 Army D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22664
Forward overall
#1238
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Couto
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Leimbrock
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian McGilvrey
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.