IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Schubert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Paul’s School NE-Prep 27 7 12 19 0.704 0.1357 0.1357 0.3220 0.3220
2019-20 St. Paul’s School NE-Prep 27 13 24 37 1.370 0.2644 0.2644 0.6271 0.6271
2020-21 — NAHL 40 5 8 13 0.325 0.1154 0.1154 0.3412 0.3412
2021-22 Northeast Generals NAHL 56 10 12 22 0.393 0.1396 0.1396 0.4125 0.4126
2022-23 Northeast Generals NAHL 57 12 12 24 0.421 0.1496 0.1423 0.4421 0.4205
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Norwich D3 LittleEast GR 26 2 3 5 0.192
2024-25 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 10 0 2 2 0.200
2023-24 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35734
Forward overall
#2169
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Thorogood
Marian · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Roman Uchyn
St. Norbert · 2014-15
0.690 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Burnett
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.