← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Troutwine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Eveleth-Gilbert USHS-MN 27 16 22 38 1.407 0.3789 0.3789 0.3419 0.3419
2020-21 Janesville Jets NAHL 41 2 10 12 0.293 0.1160 0.1160 0.3073 0.3073
2021-22 Janesville Jets NAHL 58 7 35 42 0.724 0.2869 0.2869 0.7602 0.7603
2022-23 Janesville Jets NAHL 24 3 5 8 0.333 0.1321 0.1256 0.3499 0.3327
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA 31 2 2 4 0.129
2023-24 Holy Cross D1 AHA 18 0 2 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2023-24 · Holy Cross
-38.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8176
Defenseman overall
#1882
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2004-05
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.