← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles-Edward Tardif Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cornwall Colts CCHL 6 1 2 3 0.500 0.1596 0.1596 0.3871 0.3871
2020-21 NAHL 33 2 9 11 0.333 0.1321 0.1321 0.3499 0.3499
2021-22 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 28 6 11 17 0.607 0.2261 0.2291 0.8846 0.8962
2022-23 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 16 21 37 0.685 0.2552 0.2461 0.9984 0.9626
2023-24 Maine Nordiques NAHL 60 36 28 64 1.067 0.4226 0.3963 1.1199 1.0503
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 22 0 4 4 0.182
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 35 2 9 11 0.314
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2024-25 · Sacred Heart
+9.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13528
Forward overall
#652
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.518 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2014-15
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.