← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles-Edward Tardif Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cornwall Colts CCHL 6 1 2 3 0.500 0.1085 0.1085 0.3869 0.3869
2020-21 NAHL 33 2 9 11 0.333 0.1225 0.1225 0.3518 0.3518
2021-22 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 28 6 11 17 0.607 0.2339 0.2370 0.8835 0.8951
2022-23 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 16 21 37 0.685 0.2640 0.2545 0.9972 0.9615
2023-24 Maine Nordiques NAHL 60 36 28 64 1.067 0.3919 0.3675 1.1259 1.0559
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 22 0 4 4 0.182
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 35 2 9 11 0.314
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2024-25 · Sacred Heart
+13.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13740
Forward overall
#657
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2014-15
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2016-17
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.