← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cal Mell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Express Hockey Club EHL 38 2 17 19 0.500 0.1759 0.1911 0.2452 0.2664
2019-20 Express Hockey Club EHL 46 5 24 29 0.630 0.2218 0.2218 0.3091 0.3091
2020-21 Janesville Jets NAHL 34 1 9 10 0.294 0.1165 0.1165 0.3088 0.3088
2021-22 Janesville Jets NAHL 60 3 36 39 0.650 0.2575 0.2396 0.6824 0.6349
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Union D1 ECAC SR 32 0 6 6 0.188
2024-25 Union D1 ECAC JR 24 0 1 1 0.042
2023-24 Union D1 ECAC SO 35 0 7 7 0.200
2022-23 Union D1 ECAC FR 34 3 12 15 0.441
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2022-23 · Union
+112.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6398
Defenseman overall
#1413
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.