IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zack Nazzarett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-08-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 43 19 23 42 0.977 0.2394 0.2581 0.6725 0.7250
2018-19 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 12 1 2 3 0.250 0.1475 0.1502 0.7509 0.7649
2019-20 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 14 1 5 6 0.429 0.2528 0.2528 1.2873 1.2873
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 38 11 25 36 0.947 0.3481 0.3481 1.0000 1.0000
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 19 7 4 11 0.579
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2019-20 · Alaska Anchorage
+249.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16823
Forward overall
#742
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jestin Somero
SUNY Morrisville · 2016-17
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Shand
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trever Hertz
Utica · 2007-08
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.