IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Svenddal Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Blake USHS-MN 31 9 27 36 1.161 0.3126 0.3126 0.2821 0.2821
2020-21 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 41 2 5 7 0.171 0.0676 0.0676 0.1792 0.1792
2021-22 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 52 3 27 30 0.577 0.2286 0.2207 0.6057 0.5847
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA SR 31 0 1 1 0.032
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA — 33 1 7 8 0.242
2023-24 Augustana D1 CCHA — 20 0 2 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2023-24 · Augustana
-58.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6873
Defenseman overall
#1500
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grant Newcomer
Concordia · 2021-22
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicolas Guerra
Concordia · 2016-17
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Niko Benjamin
Norwich · 2024-25
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.