← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicolas Guerra Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 22 2 0 2 0.091 0.0354 0.0388 0.1326 0.1452
2014-15 BCHL 36 5 3 8 0.222 0.0865 0.0907 0.3240 0.3398
2015-16 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 38 4 5 9 0.237 0.0922 0.0917 0.3453 0.3436
2016-17 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 4 2 1 3 0.750 0.2919 0.2755 1.0937 1.0324
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 21 15 9 24 1.143
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 25 14 10 24 0.960
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 25 14 7 21 0.840
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 23 8 10 18 0.783
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2017-18 · Concordia
+352.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44016
Forward overall
#2036
Forward born in 1996
#3332
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2001-02
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.