IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Stachowiak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Minot Minotauros NAHL 47 0 7 7 0.149 0.0547 0.0547 0.1572 0.1572
2021-22 Minot Minotauros NAHL 53 8 20 28 0.528 0.1941 0.2007 0.5576 0.5765
2022-23 Minot Minotauros NAHL 58 14 23 37 0.638 0.2344 0.2308 0.6733 0.6630
2023-24 Minot Minotauros NAHL 59 14 32 46 0.780 0.2865 0.2684 0.8230 0.7711
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC SO 3 0 1 1 0.333
2024-25 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC — 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18804
Forward overall
#960
Forward born in 2003
#1151
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Clerc
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Rooney
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Kesselring
Curry · 2024-25
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.