← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Connor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 29 1 5 6 0.207 0.0399 0.0399 0.0947 0.0947
2019-20 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 27 0 2 2 0.074 0.0143 0.0143 0.0339 0.0339
2020-21 Maine Nordiques NAHL 51 0 7 7 0.137 0.0488 0.0488 0.1442 0.1442
2021-22 Maine Nordiques NAHL 58 5 15 20 0.345 0.1225 0.1160 0.3620 0.3428
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Curry D3 CNE SR 16 0 5 5 0.312
2024-25 Curry D3 CNE JR 27 3 7 10 0.370
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE SO 27 5 15 20 0.741
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE FR 29 5 15 20 0.690
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2022-23 · Curry
+870.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19628
Defenseman overall
#2987
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.