IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaac Keller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Minot Minotauros NAHL 45 2 3 5 0.111 0.0395 0.0395 0.1166 0.1166
2021-22 — NAHL 58 6 13 19 0.328 0.1164 0.1202 0.3439 0.3551
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 59 6 14 20 0.339 0.1204 0.1184 0.3559 0.3500
2023-24 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 12 23 35 0.603 0.2143 0.2005 0.6335 0.5928
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England D3 — — 28 5 10 15 0.536
2024-25 New England D3 — — 19 0 4 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2024-25 · New England
+46.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31159
Forward overall
#1837
Forward born in 2003
#2831
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ikki Kogawa
Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brodie Tutton
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Kilty
Endicott · 2015-16
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.