← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaac Keller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Minot Minotauros NAHL 45 2 3 5 0.111 0.0408 0.0408 0.1173 0.1173
2021-22 NAHL 58 6 13 19 0.328 0.1204 0.1243 0.3458 0.3571
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 59 6 14 20 0.339 0.1245 0.1224 0.3578 0.3519
2023-24 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 12 23 35 0.603 0.2217 0.2075 0.6369 0.5960
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of New England D3 CNE SO 28 5 10 15 0.536
2024-25 University of New England D3 CNE 19 0 4 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2024-25 · University of New England
+41.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30948
Forward overall
#1825
Forward born in 2003
#2837
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2015-16
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.