← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Kadolph Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Brainerd USHS-MN 24 9 22 31 1.292 0.1635 0.1635 0.3138 0.3138
2020-21 Minot Minotauros NAHL 26 2 0 2 0.077 0.0283 0.0283 0.0812 0.0812
2021-22 Minot Minotauros NAHL 50 1 13 14 0.280 0.1029 0.1009 0.2955 0.2899
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minot State University ACHA_D1 30 3 23 26 0.867
2024-25 Minot State University ACHA_D1 30 3 23 26 0.867
2023-24 Minot State University ACHA_D1 30 3 23 26 0.867
2022-23 Minot State University ACHA_D1 30 3 23 26 0.867
2021-22 Minot State University ACHA_D1 30 3 23 26 0.867
2020-21 Minot State University ACHA_D1 30 3 23 26 0.867
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2020-21 · Minot State University
+519.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38650
Forward overall
#2389
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2023-24
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2003-04
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.