IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jayar Luedke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Simley USHS-MN 22 1 12 13 0.591 0.0728 0.0728 0.1435 0.1435
2020-21 Simley USHS-MN 17 10 11 21 1.235 0.1522 0.1522 0.3001 0.3001
2021-22 Simley USHS-MN 28 17 11 28 1.000 0.1232 0.1232 0.2429 0.2429
2023-24 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 29 7 13 20 0.690 0.1594 0.1561 — —
2024-25 — NAHL 48 13 9 22 0.458 0.1628 0.1517 0.4812 0.4485
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 19 4 4 8 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2025-26 · Gustavus Adolphus
+220.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19203
Forward overall
#997
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Gieseler
Adrian · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Serpico
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Henry Cleghorn
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.