← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Northeast Generals NAHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.3552 0.3552 1.0499 1.0499
2021-22 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 39 18 19 37 0.949 0.1070 0.1117 0.3227 0.3370
2022-23 Northeast Generals NAHL 43 5 11 16 0.372 0.1322 0.1330 0.3907 0.3931
2023-24 Northeast Generals NAHL 57 15 22 37 0.649 0.2306 0.2210 0.6815 0.6532
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Trinity D3 NESCAC 19 1 2 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2024-25 · Trinity
-0.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23050
Forward overall
#1245
Forward born in 2003
#1702
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2003-04
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.