IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremy Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-12-21 Country: USA
2007 · Round 2, Pick #54  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 51 2 9 11 0.216 0.1272 0.1410 0.6478 0.7182
2002-03 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 60 0 10 10 0.167 0.0983 0.1029 0.5007 0.5241
2003-04 Omaha Lancers USHL 53 6 10 16 0.302 0.1781 0.1770 0.9067 0.9012
2004-05 Youngstown Phantoms NAHL 51 8 27 35 0.686 0.2521 0.2411 0.7244 0.6927
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SR 16 0 1 1 0.062
2007-08 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#6416
Defenseman overall
#788
Defenseman born in 1984

D1 Comparables

Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tory Allan
Norwich · 2008-09
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zilka
Hamline · 2006-07
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Kender
Rivier · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.