← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simon Labelle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Rockland Nationals CCHL 48 15 22 37 0.771 0.1672 0.1904 0.5964 0.6791
2019-20 Rockland Nationals CCHL 54 24 27 51 0.944 0.2048 0.2048 0.7307 0.7307
2020-21 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 19 2 8 10 0.526 0.2028 0.2028 0.7659 0.7659
2021-22 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 54 12 32 44 0.815 0.3139 0.3103 1.1858 1.1721
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 37 13 15 28 0.757
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 25 1 12 13 0.520
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 36 7 20 27 0.750
2022-23 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 40 4 11 15 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · Colgate
+67.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19306
Forward overall
#1029
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2017-18
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.