← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Kurrle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Maine Nordiques NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Maine Nordiques NAHL 48 4 10 14 0.292 0.1072 0.1104 0.3079 0.3171
2022-23 BCHL 47 6 2 8 0.170 0.0656 0.0629 0.2477 0.2377
2023-24 Maine Nordiques NAHL 11 2 1 3 0.273 0.1002 0.0935 0.2878 0.2685
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 25 7 10 17 0.680
2024-25 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 25 7 10 17 0.680
2023-24 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 25 7 10 17 0.680
2022-23 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 25 7 10 17 0.680
2021-22 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 25 7 10 17 0.680
2020-21 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 25 7 10 17 0.680

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#47595
Forward overall
#3141
Forward born in 2003
#5397
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2018-19
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2009-10
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.