IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Deur Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-01-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 48 6 10 16 0.333 0.1184 0.1198 0.3499 0.3541
2008-09 Marquette Rangers NAHL 34 1 1 2 0.059 0.0209 0.0201 0.0617 0.0594
2009-10 Texas Tornado NAHL 54 15 22 37 0.685 0.2434 0.2245 0.7194 0.6634
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SR 16 4 3 7 0.438
2012-13 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — JR 17 2 1 3 0.176
2011-12 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SO 13 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — FR 23 1 8 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2010-11 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+220.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34704
Forward overall
#1131
Forward born in 1989
#3403
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shayne Morrissey
Neumann · 2012-13
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Glaesmer
St. Mary's · 2006-07
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manny Gialedakis
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.