← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Rothstein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 44 13 9 22 0.500 0.0553 0.0553 0.1584 0.1584
2020-21 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 40 20 19 39 0.975 0.1078 0.1078
2021-22 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 23 17 13 30 1.304 0.1443 0.1420
2022-23 Maine Nordiques NAHL 20 3 3 6 0.300 0.1066 0.1014 0.3150 0.2997
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Curry D3 CNE GR 12 6 4 10 0.833
2024-25 Curry D3 CNE SR 11 4 1 5 0.455
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE JR 17 2 1 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2023-24 · Curry
+75.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28026
Forward overall
#1622
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2021-22
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2016-17
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.