IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caden Triggs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Moorhead USHS-MN 29 34 22 56 1.931 0.5198 0.5198 0.4690 0.4690
2020-21 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 8 2 0 2 0.250 0.0707 0.0707 0.1575 0.1575
2021-22 — NAHL 50 14 11 25 0.500 0.1857 0.1771 0.5294 0.5048
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 25 13 17 30 1.200
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 25 6 6 12 0.480
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 25 5 7 12 0.480
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 8 7 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2022-23 · Concordia
+123.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8937
Forward overall
#264
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Panisa
St. Olaf · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Gannon
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Michalchuk
Middlebury · 2001-02
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.